AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

/
🔴
1 results
💡 How to pick a processor
What to look for:
  • Socket must match your motherboard (AM5 for new AMD, LGA1851 for new Intel)
  • Core count and clock speed for performance
  • TDP (wattage) affects cooling needs
💰 Budget builds: under $200. Mainstream gaming: $250-$400. Enthusiast: $500+
FILTERS
🔍
SORTVIEW
FILTERS:
ProductCores/ThreadsSocketTDPScoreValuePrice
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G CPU
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD★★★★★4.5🔥 DEAL -$155
8C/16T
AM4
65W
35%
B
$359
$204
2 stores
Specifications
cpuMark24287
SocketAM4
Cores/Threads8C
Threads16
Base Clock3.8GHz
Boost Clock4.6GHz
TDP65W
MemoryDDR4
Max RAM3200
L3 Cache16
iGPUYes
iGPU NameRadeon Vega 8
ArchitectureZen 3
PERFORMANCE
35%
Customer Reviews★★★★★5.0 · 2 reviews
★★★★★CPU offering a built-in GPU that can actually game
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a specialized powerhouse that occupies a unique niche in the AM4 ecosystem. Unlike the "X" variants, this is a monolithic "Cezanne" die rather than a chiplet design, which brings both distinct technical advantages and specific trade-offs for the enthusiast builder. Integrated Graphics & 1080p Performance The headline feature is the Radeon Vega 8 graphics. In technical testing, it remains one of the most capable iGPUs ever released for the desktop. For users without a discrete GPU, it comfortably handles popular eSports titles like Valorant, CS:GO, and Dota 2 at 1080p with consistent frame rates. Even more demanding titles like Fortnite or GTA V are playable at 1080p on low-to-medium settings. Architecture & Memory Latency While it shares the Zen 3 name with the 5800X, there are two critical technical differences: L3 Cache: The 5700G has 16MB of L3 cache, which is half of what you find on the 5700X/5800X. This can lead to slightly lower 1% low frame rates when paired with a high-end discrete GPU. Monolithic Die: Because it isn't a chiplet design, the memory latency is actually superior to the Vermeer chips. This makes the 5700G highly responsive to high-speed DDR4; while it officially supports 3200MHz, it often excels with 3600MHz or 4000MHz kits, which significantly boosts the iGPU's bandwidth. Thermal & Power Efficiency TDP & Cooling: At a 65W default TDP, it is remarkably efficient. The bundled Wraith Stealth cooler is sufficient for stock operation, but if you plan to utilize the unlocked multiplier for overclocking, I recommend a mid-range air tower. Thermal Ceiling: The 95°C Tjmax provides a safe buffer for PBO (Precision Boost Overdrive) tuning. In my builds, it typically idles around 35°C and stays under 70°C during heavy gaming on air cooling. Technical Limitations to Note The most significant "hidden" trade-off is the PCIe 3.0 limitation. Unlike the 5700X, this processor does not support PCIe 4.0. If you are using a high-end Gen4 NVMe SSD or a GPU that relies on x8 Gen4 lanes (like the RX 6600), you will be capped at Gen3 speeds. The Verdict: This is the ultimate "safety net" CPU. It’s perfect for small form factor (SFF) builds, home office workstations, or gamers waiting for GPU prices to drop. It provides 8-core/16-thread multi-threaded muscle that rivals the 3700X while offering a built-in GPU that can actually game.
R4LDZ ✅ · 2026-01-25 · via amazon
★★★★★This thing is under-priced - but don't tell AMD
– INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND iGPU IMPRESSION This is actually an OUTSTANDING Cpu. I bought it for building a test-bench with "OpenBenchTable" (you can look it up on youtube, they're pretty sweet), and I figured it might be a good idea to have integrated graphics built-in. Boy, was I right. A video card that worked perfectly well with my other system (which I'm still using) for some reason would not participate in video output, even though its fans were spinning. As a matter of fact, if it weren't for this iGPU, I probably wouldn't have even been able to build my system. Once I got everything running and setup however, for some reason the video card I was just talking about suddenly started working (and it's not a matter of drivers because we're including the BIOS display here too). However - what I came to realize, to my great dismay and simultaneous delight, was that the built-in AMD Radeon graphics on this chip actually look BETTER than the mid-tier GTX 10-series that eventually started working. There was a washed-out and overly exposed character to the Nvidia graphics, while the Radeon built-ins came right out of the box looking rich, properly contrasted and - for lack of a better term - THICC... (plus, AMD's display management software beats Nvidia's any day, and this comes from a daily Nvidia driver) – IGPU PERFORMANCE (emulation gaming) Ok, so I didn’t build this test-bench for AAA gaming purposes. But I do like me some emulation, and I figured the G in “5700G” must have stood for “O.G.” So I threw on a PS2 emulator (PCSX2) and here are my very un-scientific results. Gran Turismo 3 was a little too stuttery at 2K (4x original resolution), though less than I thought; 4K was a no-go, though the system tried (6x original); and 1080p was ABSOLUTELY playable (3x original), and I plan to do it again sometime with a friend. You’d probably get the best outcome from 720, but I’m a little snobbish about my emulation standards. The entire CPU package itself got to 52° also, for what that’s worth, and the graphics processing ramped-up to 2000mHz. All-in-all, not bad for what you get especially considering how much emulators rely on V-ram (which there isn’t much of here). – CPU IMPRESSION As for the CPU itself, I'm equally impressed. I was ABOUT to click "buy" on the 5950X, since it seems to be the top of the line that AM4 will support as I went with a B550 motherboard instead of B650 for compatibility purposes (afterall, "testbench" remember?). I figured “well, it’s open-air, maybe I can get away with non-liquid cooling despite the 5950x’s product recommendation;” but then I realized I wouldn’t have had a grahpics backup, and as I mentioned, this would have been a disaster for not only my system setup, but also my wallet! So now not only am I saving on money and space, but I’m also saving on power as well. Win, win, win. – CPU/TEMP PERFORMANCE (non-gaming) Performance-wise, so far I've experienced no lagginess or lack of processing throughput thus far. It sticks around 4,000 mhz at any given time for basic tasks (3.7ghz to 4.5d), and alternates between low 30’s to low 40’s celsius. During non-overclocked performance testing (with Gigabyte autotune turned on) using Prime95, it hovered around 59-60° during a three minute “blend” test - but surprisingly, with “small FFT torture” it actually stuck around 55° instead. Only with CPU-Z multi-core stress testing did it get anywhere near 70° (and remember, this is with an open benchtable setup), so I’m really not worried about the temps – though I have no doubt their lower baseline due to this setup is probably contributing to its performance somewhat. Ambient temp of ~78° throughout. NOTE: This is with a bequiet! Pure Rock 2 FX, which looks really “benchin’” on my rig as well (see photo), and I’m sure is helping with those temperatures more than the included wraith cooler (which is still nice to have on hand as a backup). I also used Noctua NT-H1 grease this time, which seems to perform 1° better against Arctic’s MX-4 based on previous tests I did with my other system. – OPERATING SYSTEMS I forgot to mention, the operating systems I've deployed thus-far on this system have been: Windows 10 Fedora Linux and “Haiku” OS (yes, actually that) ALL of these have been completely functional right out-of-the-box, without the need for installing additional drivers. I only added the drivers for Windows 10 because I wanted the RADEON graphics management software, and also just to see what it would do. You could honestly live without them if you wanted because the hardware is simply so universally compatible. Giant plus there, especially for a workbench station. GIANT plus on AMD's part for making dedicated software for multiple Linux distributions as well. – TAKEAWAY After this experience, I’m seriously considering looking into Radeon for any graphical expansions I might want to do with this board. I didn’t expect its initial output to be so utterly solid. My only concern would be size in that case, since this is a Micro-ATX that I’m working with and it seems a long GPU would actually cover the SATA ports. But I need to stop overdoing it with my drives so much anyway XD – BOTTOM-LINE If you’re looking for something rock-solid for that lingering AM4 seat that can be relied upon under any conditions and you don’t want to spend a fortune, you CAN’T go wrong with this chip. Well worth the price, and well performing for the price range.
SMITH · 2024-05-13 · via amazon
Buy Now
NeweggBEST
✓ In Stock
$204
Buy →
Amazon
✓ In Stock
$208.14
Buy →
Best Buy
Not tracked at this retailer
N/A
MSI
Not tracked at this retailer
N/A
Newegg (Open Box)
Not tracked at this retailer
N/A
VALUE SCORE
B
17.2
Good value
Performance (35%) ÷ Price ($204) = 17.2
S ≥28 · A ≥20 · B ≥14 · C ≥8 · D <8
FUTURE-PROOFING
⚠️AM4 — end of life, no CPU upgrade path
⚠️DDR4 only — no DDR5 path
💰
Below MSRP
Was $359 → $204
Save $4.14 at newegg vs amazon
43% off
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G CPU
CONSIDER INSTEAD
SAVE $54.00999999999999177% of this product's perf
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Cores
14C/14T
Boost
5.2GHz
Socket
LGA1851
TDP
125W
$149.99
+27% FASTER$54.00999999999999 cheaper
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Cores
14C/14T
Boost
5.2GHz
Socket
LGA1851
TDP
125W
$149.99