500GB Extreme Portable External SSD - Up to 550MB/s - USB-C, USB 3.1 - SDSSDE60-500G-G25

These SSD cards are much larger than conventional USB flash drives, but their technology is much more complex, hence the need for a larger form factor, which also helps dissipate heat, so they do not become more than warm in operation. Still, they are highly portable -- small and slim -- and incredibly fast, matching the speed of internal Solid-State drives, and their price is excellent. It is only slightly higher than the best flash drives, but these cards considerably out-perform those drives. These SSD cards are unmatched for large file transfers. I have observed write rates of 400 MB/sec or more, and read rates close to 500 MB/sec. They make outstanding external "hard drives" from which to run alternative operating systems. They are noticeably faster than any of the flash drives I have. Their unique shape, with the large lanyard loop that can accommodate a carabiner or even larger holder, makes them very transportable. The short and sturdy USB-C cables are stiff, but otherwise perfect, and the included USB-C to USB-A adaptor provides universal connection to any USB port, which is perfect for my equipment. Just make sure that the arrows on the USB-C plugs and on the USB C-to-A adaptor line up, or there will be no connection, because the devices are "keyed" to ensure proper alignment. Any USB port that is rated USB 3.0 or higher provides the highest transfer rates currently available. The A, B, and C designations merely identify the physical form of the connection. Type C is no faster or better than A and B, but it is a "universal" port, in addition to being a USB port. Barring hardware difficulties or failures, you should find this drive a perfect choice for most of your large-file transfer and storage requirements.

Lew Miller · 2020-01-01 · via amazon

This external is absolutely perfect for my needs. I bought the 2TB version and it has become my "everything" drive. I love having all of this space in such a portable form factor! It's actually smaller than I expected it to be and it slips perfectly in my pocket and disappears because it's so lightweight. Of course, don't rely on a drive like this alone as your only backup. I have a 12TB NAS with redundancy that I use to back up this SSD (among other things) and my NAS is automatically backed up via Backblaze, so I have three locations (Backblaze being remote), and I have redundancy on my NAS so if one of those drives fails then I can replace it without losing anything. Unfortunately I cannot harness the full speed of this drive because I'm using a 2014 MacBook Pro which only has USB-3, which is about half the speed of USB-C, furthermore I have this plugged into a powered USB hub. That being said, to my surprise I'm actually getting around 405 MB/s writes and 425 MB/s reads, which is significantly better than I thought I would get, this is a little over 4X faster than real world performance of a standard non-SSD external drive, so it's still plenty zippy for my needs! To test a sustained load I moved over my existing Kontakt library (music production plugins and such). A 160GB transfer took me 8 minutes and 23 seconds, which is perfectly fine, when moving using a standard non-SSD external it takes almost 35 minutes! A more reasonable 3GB transfer takes around 7-8 seconds, doing the same file transfer over to my WD EasyStore (standard HDD) takes about 38 seconds. For fun I tested transferring 3GB to my NAS and it took 1 minute 36 seconds. I expected it to be slow because I don't have the best internal network plus I'm using slow (but reliable) drives and it has to write the data multiple times. The NAS is just for bulk storage. The icing on top is the added durability. This is IP55 rated which means it can withstand dust and splashing, which means it's great for outdoor use for storing photos and such. Furthermore, it's rated to withstand a 2 meter (roughly 6.5 foot) drop. This is a great little drive! My MBP only has a 500GB drive and all of my plugins and samples were eating up hundreds of gigs and I was becoming really tired of constantly having to go through everything and try to maintain space. I wasn't even able to download all of my Kontakt content locally because I simply didn't have enough room, so I had to pick and choose what plugins I wanted to have locally, trying to store everything on the NAS was error-prone because Kontakt didn't like it for some reason but it was also way too slow. This drive is fast enough to where I can work on Logic Pro X projects directly on it without having to create scratch space locally, something I couldn't do with a normal non-SSD external (way too cumbersome). Now instead of having only 10-20GB local storage I’m back up to around 320GB - much better! I can breathe! Just remember - don't rely on any external as your only backup! Try to back up your most important data in three locations, one being a remote location, if possible.

Steven · 2020-09-22 · via amazon

I bought 2TB version last December 2018. First thing to like is portability — it's very small and light; it looked durable too. I went to Nazaré, Portugal to video big wave surfing (you can find the videos in my Youtube channel). My workflow: after I record my clips. I send the files to this SSD and back up the same files with another SSD (this time Samsung EVO 860) via Macbook 13 inch 2018. No hiccups at all. You don't need a case for this unless you're OCD. When I get home. I unload the files but I found out that I can actually edit my 4k videos straight from this using Final Cut Pro. I can freely play in my timeline without dropped frames. (Note: I'm also using eGPU while editing). So far my Macbook always recognize this SSD. I formatted it to APFS and when I'm not traveling, this drive is tethered to the laptop. Will I buy this again? Probably, no. Even though the price is dropping, at almost 20 cents/GB, this is is still very expensive. I can buy Samsung QVO at 15 cents/GB today and get some saving. Also, as of this writing, it only offers up to 2TB while QVO or EVO offers 4TB. If you're a casual video editor and loves light traveling, 1TB of this drive is very valuable. Even if you don't edit video, this SSD is also good for backing up your photos/files from your main drive, plus another cloud back up. The form factor is just unmatched. But if you want SSD but don't mind a little bulky and added enclosure, better to buy the Samsung 860 SSD.

JP · 2019-02-08 · via amazon

I have a late 2016 13-inch MacBook Pro with stock specs, including a 256 GB SSD. Well, 256 GB is not enough when you've allocated part of it to Bootcamp, you're recording an album in Logic Pro X, and you regularly have design partners sending you multiple-GB Illustrator files. I really wanted more disk space, but the sad fact is that the only way to get more internal storage from Apple at this point would have required me to drop over $2000 on a new MacBook Pro. Realizing that was not what I wanted to do at this time, I decided I needed an external SSD that I could keep plugged in at all times. It needed to be as fast as my internal disk. It needed to run off USB power. And it needed to be small and light enough that it could just hang from the USB-C port if I am sitting with the computer on my lap. (Oh, and of course, it needed to be reliable!) This hard drive meets all of those requirements, and I think it looks great too! It is super-fast. Fast enough that I can actually record directly to it with Logic Pro X with no latency or dropouts. I keep all of my work on it and barely notice it's there. Probably the only downside is that I rely on it too much! Someday I might do something stupid like pull the cord out while it's writing data, and corrupt everything. But that's just the nature of external hard drives on a Mac. (I might also lose it, since it's so small. But I keep a close eye on it.) I chose the 256 GB model because of its low price and because I knew it was all the storage I needed, but if I ever need more space, I wouldn't hesitate to buy its identical larger-capacity siblings. This hard drive saved me two grand!

S. Anderson · 2019-04-01 · via amazon

I have bought both the SanDisk 500GB Extreme (550 MB/s) and the SanDisk 500GB Extreme PRO (1050 MB/s) to use them primarily as external drives for my iPad Pro 12.9” 3rd Gen. Both drives are great and and work flawlessly with my iPad Pro using iPadOS 13 file system. What follows is a side by side comparison between the two SanDisk drives. Weight and Size: The Pro is much larger and heavier than the Standard (77g vs 40.7g ). BTW, the cable that comes with the Standard model is too short to rest the drive on any surface. Thank god, the SSD is light enough to safely dangle by the cable off the iPad. Temperature: The Pro remained cool even during writing a 95GB file to it for more than 25 minutes, whereas the Standard model was very warm to touch after writing to it a 5GB for less than 2 minutes. No wonder, additional 37 grams of aluminum body on the Pro absorb and dissipate heat faster. Solution: Don’t copy giant files to the plastic drive unless the ambient air is cool or point a small portable fan at it. Protection against the elements and overheating in hot and humid climates: Both drives are rugged and will probably withstand hot and humid environments, like Costa Rica where I live part of the year. The Pro will run cooler under the same circumstances. Price: The Pro is $125 whereas the Standard model is $90, minus 15% cash back special, so the effective price is $76.50. It is almost $50 less than the Pro. The Pro is new this year. The prices may come down in 2020. Performance: Note that iPad Pro supports the true USB 3.1 Gen 2 interface, that allows the Pro to reach it’s maximum transfer speed of 1050MB/s, as per product description. - Copy ~5GB file from the SanDisk to iPad: Pro - 22 sec, Standard - 45s - Copy ~5GB file from iPad to the SanDisk: Pro - 67 sec, Standard - 106s Here the Pro is almost 2x as fast in both directions. - Copy ~95GB file from the SanDisk to iPad: Pro - 10m 50s, Standard 10m 39s (Here there is no difference, probably because the write to iPad speed is the determining factor, not the read from Sandisk) - Copy ~95GB file from iPad to the SanDisk: Pro - 26m 15s, Standard 37min (Here the Pro is about 11 minutes or 40% faster than the Standard). The only real performance advantage of the Pro model is when copying giant amounts of data (hundreds of Gigabytes) to the SSD from iPad. I am willing to wait extra 10 minutes for every 100GB to save $50. Copying large amounts of data to iPad from both SSD’s produce identical speed. On my 5 year old PC with USB 3.0 interface, the time writing the 95GB file to either drive was identical - 5m 20s at 290MB/sec. (Note that the PC with USB 3.0 is 5 times faster writing to the Pro SSD than iPad with USB 3.1, and 7 times faster writing to the Standard than iPad. I guess iPad Pro is not very good at writing to external media in general. Can it be that Apple intentionally slowed the Write to external memory API, to sell iPads and iPhones with larger built in storage? Mine is 256GB.) Bottom line: The small speed/time advantage of the Pro in most real life situations, like editing video files on iPad and then saving the results back to the external SSD, does not justify IMHO almost double the cost of the Pro compared to the standard model. So I kept the Standard model and the PRO went back to Amazon. Both drives deserve 5 stars and both have their own advantages for different types of users. UPDATE for tech minded: As per some users’ advice I reformatted the drive. Changed the exFat Allocation Unit (AU) or Cluster Size from the original 1MB to the Microsoft’s default of 128KB (8 times smaller). To change the AUS or cluster size do Quick Format only. You will still lose all the files on the drive. This saves about 10% of space for my large collection of MP3 music files which average 1 to 5 MB is size. For video files that are 1 to 5 GB it does not matter. For large number of word documents, TXT or HTML files that average less than 128K, the space savings can be 90%. The small AUS slowed the data transfer speed from 2 to 8 times depending on configuration. The worst case scenario is on PC. Copying the huge 95GB file to the Standard Model SSD went from 5 to 40 minutes. The slowdown makes sense because the each cluster is transferred as a single read write operation. The total number of clusters transferred increased as the cluster size decreased about the same 8x. Bottom line: Use AUS that is appropriate for the typical file size in your application. What you save on space will come out of the speed. exFat for allows clusters as small as 32K.

Val S. · 2019-11-07 · via amazon

Best Buy

Not tracked at this retailer

MSI

Not tracked at this retailer

Newegg

Not tracked at this retailer

Newegg (Open Box)

Not tracked at this retailer