I'm really enjoying this mouse pad so far from Razer. No unnecessary frills and it gets the job done.
I like the little Razer logo on the corner, subtle and sleek. I was a little disappointed when I saw the size of it once I pulled it out of the box, but that's my bad for not reading the dimensions closely.
I adjusted to the smaller size right away during my gaming session. It's a regular mouse pad size, which isn't bad for me, I was just used to having a bigger mouse pad previously and it threw me off for only a short moment.
Honestly, it's nice having more space on my desk compared to when I had the bigger mouse pad!
The tracking on this mouse pad is excellent, it's working beautifully with my mouse. I also like that this mat is nice and thin, not too thick like some pads, so it doesn't stick too high up off of my desk, which is a plus for me.
Overall, I highly recommend this product. Just be aware that it's your basic mouse pad size, if that concerns you when it comes to gaming.
It's working great for me, no complaints at all. Would buy again!
Kane A. Smith · 2020-12-30 · via amazon
★★★★★Cheap Price, Quality Product
It’s a mystery to me why poorly made mousepads with bulky, uneven stitches on the side sell when such a quality mousepad exists for the same price. The mousepad is thin, very comfortable to use and lay your hand on, and has very good anti-slip material on the bottom. The subtle black etched logo makes for a very clean and professional aesthetic. This mousepad is a great choice for both gaming and work.
Irena · 2020-10-25 · via amazon
★★★★★Very nice but a little large
I had the 2013 version of this mousepad that started to fall apart. The green rubber back started to get sticky and it got stuck on things. Since it was such a good pad I decided to get this as a replacement. The new one is just as good as I remember.
Amazon Customer · 2024-10-01 · via amazon
★★★★★SteelSeries QcK vs Razer Goliathus Mobile vs iXCC Smooth Silk Stitched vs Glorious Stitched
This is a comparison review between the SteelSeries QcK, Razer Goliathus Mobile, iXCC Smooth Silk Stitched, and Glorious Stitched mousepads.
Surface uniformity: the SteelSeries, Razer, and iXCC are perfectly uniform as far as I can tell. The Glorious has some nicks as you drag a mouse across it, and resistance varies slightly by angle.
Surface resistance: surprisingly to me, there’s a big difference. The SteelSeries and Razer are relatively high, the Glorious in the middle, and the iXCC the lowest. The difference is enough that hitting a stationary mouse with a constant amount of force moves it about twice as far on the iXCC as the SteelSeries or Razer.
Using mouseaccuracy.com, I found that I perform best with the higher resistance of the SteelSeries or Razer. With a low-resistance pad you’ll spend more time going from “cursor is moving fast near the target” to “cursor is in the target”; with a high-resistance pad you need more force to move the same distance. I found that I’m better able to compensate for the latter than the former, so, my mousing performance improves with a higher-resistance pad.
Durability: I bought the SteelSeries in 2013 and the other three a few days ago. The SteelSeries degrades severely within a few years: moderate warping, cloth peeling off, crumbling rubber backing, dirt that can’t be scrubbed out. The Razer appears to have the same construction. The Glorious has stitched edges, but they’re somewhat rough and thick, forming a rim around the pad. The iXCC’s stitching is the same height as the rest of the pad, softer, and more uniform.
Thickness: Razer 2/32 in, Glorious center 3/32 in, Glorious rim 4/32 in, iXCC 7/32 in. Measured with a tape measure, so assume some imprecision. I don’t find that thickness makes a difference to me, but I do rub against the Glorious’ rim.
Conclusion: out of my three new pads, I’m choosing the Razer for its surface, but I expect it to degrade quickly. The iXCC has great build quality, but I can’t perform as well on its surface.
